South Korean commercial banks should say \u201cthank you, crypto,\u201d local media outlets have claimed, with cryptoasset investors flocking to their platforms to set up fiat on\/off ramps in order to trade their tokens.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Per<\/a> a report from SBS, the neobank K-Bank<\/strong> has seen a staggering 1.7m new customers open accounts in the first three months of the year, with NongHyup Bank<\/strong> (NH) gaining 100,000 new customers in the past four weeks alone.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The banks, which SBS suggested were \u201csmiling ear-to-ear\u201d have been reaping the rewards of South Korea\u2019s Crypto Fever 2.0, with crypto moms<\/a> and crypto grannies<\/a> keen to join armies of 20-39-year-olds in making token investments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Under South Korean legislation passed last month, all crypto traders must open linked real name and social security number-verified bank accounts at commercial banks that partner with exchanges on a rolling six-month contractual basis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n K-Bank has teamed up with the Upbit<\/strong> crypto exchange, which this week, SBS added, saw 24-hour crypto transaction volumes exceed the daily transaction values of the KOSPI<\/strong>, the index of South Korea\u2019s largest stock exchange.<\/p>\n\n\n\n NH, meanwhile, banks Bithumb<\/strong> and Coinone<\/strong> customers. Bithumb saw transactions of USD 2.4bn on its platform on April 22, with USD 900m transacted on Coinone.<\/p>\n\n\n\n However, while banks may be enjoying crypto-themed salad days, the picture is bleaker for the customers of smaller exchanges that have not set up real-name banking protocols.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The new laws specify that exchanges failing to set up banking deals by September 24 must close or face criminal liability charges \u2013 and even jail time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n But per reports from<\/a> Donga Ilbo and<\/a> MBN, there may be as many as 200 crypto exchanges in South Korea, twice the government\u2019s estimate of \u201caround 100.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n More worrying still is the fact that some of the smaller and more obscure of these platforms appear to still be trying to attract new customers, despite not having banking protocols \u2013 nor the anti-money laundering and information security certification also required under the law \u2013 in place.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Some of these exchanges, the reports\u2019 authors noted, appear to be making outlandish and even \u201cscammy\u201d-sounding promises about the amount of money their customers can hope to make on their platforms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n